<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deleting From A Collection in STL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sambal.org/2010/07/deleting-from-a-collection-in-stl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sambal.org/2010/07/deleting-from-a-collection-in-stl/</link>
	<description>trying to avoid labels</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:10:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadav</title>
		<link>http://sambal.org/2010/07/deleting-from-a-collection-in-stl/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sambal.org/?p=831#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Erasing from STL containers is hard, and not portable between container types, but this is also true for other operations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erasing from STL containers is hard, and not portable between container types, but this is also true for other operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://sambal.org/2010/07/deleting-from-a-collection-in-stl/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 07:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sambal.org/?p=831#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Nice work, and clean code, it&#039;s a shame that these discrepancies exist.  Problem is these extra functions merely add more complexity.  If it were my project I would use the supported api for the collection and move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, and clean code, it&#8217;s a shame that these discrepancies exist.  Problem is these extra functions merely add more complexity.  If it were my project I would use the supported api for the collection and move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Peterson</title>
		<link>http://sambal.org/2010/07/deleting-from-a-collection-in-stl/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>John Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sambal.org/?p=831#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I think Item #2 in Scott Meyers&#039; Effective STL, &quot;Beware the illusion of container-independent code&quot;, is relevant here.  But that does not diminish the usefulness of the nice generic programming exercise you&#039;ve posted here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Item #2 in Scott Meyers&#8217; Effective STL, &#8220;Beware the illusion of container-independent code&#8221;, is relevant here.  But that does not diminish the usefulness of the nice generic programming exercise you&#8217;ve posted here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

